Georgia · Case in reporter volume
Smith v. Overby
Georgia decision addressing a mother's claimed bodily and mental injuries in an obstetrical malpractice action, including the adequacy of jury instructions on compensatory damages.
Complete cited case in partial volume. Collection target: Macon, Georgia 1871 publication
Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Georgia, Volume XXX
Macon, Georgia 1871 publication · 1871
Unaltered repository scan of the March Term 1860 section of Volume 30, printed pages 7–262. The complete Smith v. Overby report occupies printed pages 241–248. The imprint year is 1871. The decision belongs to the March Term of 1860. Repository issue metadata dated 1860-03 describes the court term and does not establish the edition publication year. The PDF is a partial reporter volume and contains the complete case. It is not an authored excerpt or a complete bound volume. Printed page 241 includes the end of Walker v. Floyd before Smith v. Overby begins. Printed page 249 begins the next case, Goodwyn v. Hightower and Hightower v. Goodwyn. Cited printed pages 245 and 248, the case opening, the following case opening, and the separately hosted volume title page were visually inspected. Other pages were not all visually reviewed. The court addresses the malpractice claim and instructions on damages. This record does not characterize the decision as a constitutional holding or a final finding of malpractice liability. The source PDF has machine OCR. It may contain transcription errors. The page images control.
Open reader → Download this PDF
The imprint year is 1871. The decision belongs to the March Term of 1860. Repository issue metadata dated 1860-03 describes the court term and does not establish the edition publication year.
The PDF is a partial reporter volume and contains the complete case. It is not an authored excerpt or a complete bound volume.
Printed page 241 includes the end of Walker v. Floyd before Smith v. Overby begins. Printed page 249 begins the next case, Goodwyn v. Hightower and Hightower v. Goodwyn.
Cited printed pages 245 and 248, the case opening, the following case opening, and the separately hosted volume title page were visually inspected. Other pages were not all visually reviewed.
The court addresses the malpractice claim and instructions on damages. This record does not characterize the decision as a constitutional holding or a final finding of malpractice liability.
The source PDF has machine OCR. It may contain transcription errors. The page images control.